Nerman Fatic vs Marco Bortolotti Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Bortolotti analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Marco Bortolotti Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 2 Bortolotti
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 48.76% of points on their second serve, while Bortolotti has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 44.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bortolotti has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.99% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 60.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bortolotti has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 50.77% of matches played (W/L 33/ 32), with Bortolotti winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 195), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Bortolotti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 321/ 277), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22), where as Bortolotti has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Fatic winning 1 times and Bortolotti being victorious 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Bortolotti winning 4. The last match between Fatic and Bortolotti was at the Italy F20 (Pontedera), 25-07-2018, Second, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:48:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Bortolotti have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Bortolotti 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Bortolotti 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 274.25 while Bortolotti has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bortolotti has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 38.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bortolotti has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
198
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard1
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
879
Rank
355
High
33
Age
R
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
57% (343-258)
Career Total W/L
52% (360-331)
40% (10-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nerman Fatic vs Marco Bortolotti For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fatic VS Bortolotti
Fatic VS Bortolotti H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Nerman Fatic | Marco Bortolotti |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
Sets Won | 2 | 4 |
Games Won | 23 | 34 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 0:48:40 | 0:48:40 |
1st Serve % | 63% (50/80) | 67% (54/81) |
1st Serve Win% | 54% (27/50) | 48% (26/54) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 41% (11/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 54% (44/81) | 49% (39/80) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Fatic VS Bortolotti H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Marco Bortolotti
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
6-2 7-5 | |||||
6-2 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Marco Bortolotti |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (10/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 44% (25/32) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (257/285) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
Aces Total | 100 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:36 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 302.16 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (1041/1605) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (709/1041) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (275/564) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (51/132) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (589/1620) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 39% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 39% (9/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
SF |
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
Marco Bortolotti Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Marco Bortolotti
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Marco Bortolotti
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Marco Bortolotti
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Aldin Setkic
Player
Marco Bortolotti
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Alvarez
Player
Marco Bortolotti
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
5
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
3
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pavel Kotov
Player
Marco Bortolotti
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Marco Bortolotti
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marco Bortolotti
Player
Arthur Reymond
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marco Bortolotti
Player
Luca Castagnola
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Marco Bortolotti
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Fatic Vs Bortolotti Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fatic are available here and Bortolotti photos here.